Відео

Trump was not passed over. Watch the video on the Daniel 12 prophecy fulfillment. It goes through the fulfillments mathematically. It had 2 marking points, 1963 and 2008. Between those dates there were 10 Presidents: 1 Kennedy 2 LBJ 3 Nixon 4 Ford 5 Carter 6 Reagan 7 HW Bush 8 Clinton 9 W Bush 10 Obama( Biden is included as VP here) So between 1963 and Obama's term from 2008 until 2016, the 10 horns were put in place and made the USA into the beast, ripe for the AC to take over. Trump was not necessary as a horn, as the beast has already been fulfilled. Biden didn't become President until after Trump, he was only mentioned in 2008 to fulfill the clay aspect as the second Catholic Vice-President elected into the White House.

If you read the decree... Ezra 1 2 Thus says Cyrus king of Persia: All the kingdoms of the earth the Lord God of heaven has given me. And He has commanded me to build Him a house at Jerusalem which is in Judah. 3 Who is among you of all His people? May his God be with him, and let him go up to Jerusalem which is in Judah, and build the house of the Lord God of Israel (He is God), which is in Jerusalem. The actual decree says to build the house of the Lord in Jerusalem.

@@connectingthebible-deeperb5680 Good rebuttal but not as great as I expected. Cyrus issued the very decree of Daniel 9:25. Keep in mind that Daniel’s decree is part of the 70-weeks prophecy, which stipulates that from the “‘the going forth of the command to restore and build Jerusalem until Messiah the Prince, there shall be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks’” (9:25). This means that there are a total of 69 prophetic weeks from the issuing of the decree to build Jerusalem till the coming of the Messiah. These 69 prophetic weeks amount to 69 x 7 = 483 prophetic days. Using the historicist hermeneutic that employs the year-day principle that a prophetic day is an actual solar year, most Protestants have used since the Reformation to explain the time element in apocalyptic prophecy, we arrive at a period of 483 years from the time of the issuing the decree till the appearance of Jesus Christ as the Messiah. If we accept that the proclamation of Cyrus’ decree took place circa. 537 B.C., we find that the appearance of Jesus Christ as Messiah would be 483 years later, which comes to the year 54 B.C. This is more than 50 years before the birth of Christ. It becomes clear that Cyrus’ decree circa. 537 to build Jerusalem does not qualify to be the decree of Daniel 9:25.

Agreed.

I've been sick for a bit. Waiting for my voice to recover and finish off a video about the Good Samaritan. Thank you for the kind words, God Bless

I know those with preconceptions of how things are fulfilled will find it hard to accept different ideas. Just keep an open mind that I could be right. I've done a few videos about Daniel including this one. I'm doing a video about the Good Samaritan, then I will be doing a series about all of Daniel's prophecies and connecting them all together. All the prophecies of Daniel 2, 7, 8, 9 and 12 are foretelling in different ways about the tribulation to come. I know it's hard to accept a new idea that cuts across your already formed view, but try to keep watching just in case I'm right. Even in skepticism it would benefit you to keep a sliver of your mind open to this as it could be revealing the Book of Revelation is about to start in our modern time. God Bless

@@connectingthebible-deeperb5680 John 17:24 we go to where our Lord is he overcame the world and is on his throne beside the Father true believers upon physical death go into their precense

Thank you for the kind remark even in disagreement. On this channel we do espouse a futurist interpretation of Revelation. The only thing I'd like to say is that Jesus described the Great Tribulation as the worst time in the history of the world. I do not think anything that happened in the first century could have fulfilled that even under Nero's Rome. Keep watching the news, I believe the run up to the tribulation will be starting soon. Thanks again for the approach, God Bless you as well.

@@connectingthebible-deeperb5680 re-read the transfiguration scripture only yeshua was left when cloud lifted and the Father said " this is my son listen to him Moses and Elijah the law and the prophets had passed the end discussed over and over is the end of the mosaic law system that was destroyed in 70 ad as our Lord described his eschatology was all first century also he was the nobleman who went to a far county to receive authority to rule and return are you saying he hasn't returned yet the kingdom det up by Christ in first century is spiritual and eternal hope this gets you investigating which you do well God bless brother

@@chriswilford4657 The Kingdom of Jesus Christ has not yet come. He said before he died that His kingdom was not of this world. We will not be in the Kingdom of Jesus Christ until He comes again at the end of the Tribulation.(2nd coming) That is when His 1,000 year reign begins and everyone acknowledges that Jesus is King. Clearly we live in a world of 1/3 Christian so only 1/3 of the world believes that Jesus is King, thus we do not live in Christ's Kingdom. He died 2,000 years ago to go and set up his Kingdom. It's ready but we have to go through the tribulation first. Please watch my video on the Daniel 9, 70 Weeks Prophecy, that explains the tribulation and when Jesus comes again.

@@connectingthebible-deeperb5680 thanks for reply have studied Daniels time lines and they also point to the first century the great tribulation was the massacre of 1.3 million apostate Jews and others in the Jewish wars ending with that great symbolic end with the destruction of the temple if you read any ancient text on the horros of that period eg Josephus etc it was unimaginable horror and fitted the time line perfectly don't make the mistake of the first century Jews and look for a natural fulfillment of spiritual kingdom the Zionist influence in Christianity is immense Abraham looked for a land since first century after our Lords resurrection we look to heaven please read if you can Tomas Rattray The regal advent resurrection of the past.God bless

Sure, the 10 horns are the 10 Presidents from Kennedy to Obama. (Not Biden, he isn't one of the 10 horns) If the First Beast is the USA, then the executive branch of the White House is the governmental structure for the Anti-Christ to take control of the First Beast. That's how the beast will operate from the executive branch, which includes the President and Vice-President. This is confirmed this way... Revelation 13:11 11 Then I saw another beast coming up out of the earth, and he had two horns like a lamb and spoke like a dragon. The second Beast which is the Anti-Christ will have 2 horns, that means if the Anti-Christ is a President, then the Vice-President will be the second horn of the second beast. Make sense? Now you can see why Biden was included as being part as the last horn with Obama. Both President and Vice-President are elected into the White House whenever anyone gets elected. Now Biden was significant as Obama's(10th horn) running mate, because he was the second only Catholic elected into the White House. That's it, only Kennedy and Biden are the only Catholics ever elected. Now compare the two Kennedy and Biden. Kennedy resisted the beast, he wanted to pull out of Viet Nam and was assassinated probably by the Government itself. (the Beast was already being formed, with no less than a mortal head wound) Then Biden is elected as VP(with Obama) and whatever you want to say about Biden's policies, he certainly does not resist the beast part of the US as the only Superpower in the world. Kennedy resisted the beast and was killed, Biden has embraced the beast and not only was elected as VP, but also as President after Trump. That explains why Biden was included in the pictures. The second Catholic thing was important, as in the corruption of Catholics is key to the end times. Satan corrupts from within. (wait for the Pope to be uncovered too) Biden wasn't the 10th horn, that was Obama. But he was important being elected as VP into the executive branch of the White House. As the second beast does say the AC will have 2 horns also. Hope it helps. God Bless

We do know that the 4th beast is described this way Daniel 7:7 7 “After this I saw in the night visions, and behold, a fourth beast, dreadful and terrible, exceedingly strong. It had huge iron teeth; it was devouring, breaking in pieces, and trampling the residue with its feet. It was different from all the beasts that were before it, and it had ten horns. Which matches up with the First Beast: Revelation 13:1 Then I stood on the sand of the sea. And I saw a beast rising up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and on his horns ten crowns, and on his heads a blasphemous name. Both the First beast of Rev 13 and Daniel 7's 4th beast have 10 horns. They are the same beast. I hope we can agree on that. But Daniel 7 also describes the 4th beast this way: Daniel 7:23 23 “Thus he said: ‘The fourth beast shall be A fourth kingdom on earth, Which shall be different from all other kingdoms, And shall devour the whole earth, Trample it and break it in pieces. The 4th beast is a kingdom, which is the First Beast of Revelation because they both have 10 horns. The second beast of Revelation will be the little horn to come out of the 10 horns who is known as the Anti-Christ.

No, Shem is the firstborn, they are actually listed in the order they were born, the idea that Japheth was the eldest is a mistranslation from the KJV, in the hewbrew bible the vers is: "21 And unto Shem, the father of all the children of Eber, the elder brother of Japheth, to him also were children born. "

@@becausecontextmatters5260 yes, but Shem is of different mother, not Naamah.

That overlooks the meaning of the command to start everything... Daniel 9:25 “Know therefore and understand, That from the going forth of the command To restore and build Jerusalem It was the command to start rebuilding Jerusalem. Daniel 9:23 confirms this.. Daniel 9:23 23 At the beginning of your supplications the command went out, The only command that happened at the time of Daniel's supplications was the command by Cyrus, which was prophesized by Isaiah 150 years earlier. Why would God tell Isaiah to say that if Cyrus was just the first in the long list of commands? The wall spoken about in Daniel 9 is this... Daniel 9:25 There shall be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks; The street shall be built again, and the wall, Even in troublesome times. That wall is not only Nehemiah's wall(during the 62 weeks), but also watch my video about the 144,000 in Revelation. There is a dual meaning going on here. The 144,000 also represent the wall to be built before the second coming of Jesus Christ. Sorry but the command to start this prophecy was issued by Cyrus, that's why God inspired Isaiah to speak of Cyrus before he was even born. Cyrus was a key player in this prophecy and moving into the New Covenant with God through Jesus Christ. And the eagle symbol from this prophecy connects everything into Revelation. Also watch my first beast video.

Also I think when you're talking about the mistranslations of, say, "Nimrod" as correctly being translated "rebel/rebellion", you're missing an important< intentional >>word play<< in the Hebrew where the proper noun is a name, but is also a mnemonic device alluding to another aspect (sounds like and maybe related to another word in relation to the character whose name it is). We totally lose all that in the English translations unless they have a translator footnote. (E.g., Adam/Adamah --the name Adam sounds like and may be related to the hebrew word for dirt, adamah.)

Also if you remember what you're trying to say about Assur founding Assyria, not Nimrod, you're missing that Nimrod the Hamite/Cushite , was a mighty hunter (like Esau) whose hunting represents the devil prowling around like a ravenous wolf or lion (king of predators). Esau the hunter bargained for a bowl of some red soup in exchange for his birthright (which Jacob then tricked Isaac with some goat instead of wild game), and Cain lost his birthright by sacrificing vegetables ... (Presumably some beet stew --Red soup of Esau-- LOL) to God, instead of the BBQ Lamb that Abel could have traded him for a sin offering. Things got turned back around on the worldly, fratricidal , mighty Hunter by a trickster and his mom (possibly also same scenario of Eve coaching Abel? Idk .. interesting parallel possibly). The other thing I was going to mention is that Nebuchadnezzar's statue made with gold silver bronze and iron (Babylon, medo-Persia, Greece and Rome) is basically HAMites usurping their proper place of habitation which was Egypt. That's why Jerusalem is also referred to as Sodom and Egypt. Canaanites Sodom and Ham is Egypt. The Pharisees & Saducees were spiritual hamites --- So with the possible fulfillment of cain/tubalcain, nimrod / Nebuchadnezzar (each one seemingly an evil amplification of his typological predecessor) , the four-kingdom statue is basically Nimrod "the Rebel" usurping 2 of Shems kingdoms, and 2 of japheth's kingdoms (Antiochus Epiphanes & Nero) in some sense. Assyria just took away 10 Northern tribes into mixture among the Nations. Both Assyria/Medo-Persia & Babel/Babylon are in SHEM'S territory & are usurped by Ham/Nimrod/Satan) who was supposed to be down in Africa. The bronze and iron kingdoms (Greece & Rome with their rapid conquest and violent subjugation) and gold and silver kingdoms (Babylon and medo-persia/Assyria) with their glitz glamour and wealth, Seem to me to be embodied by the 3rd Reich of Germany..... Hum. Maybe?

I do want to say I really like your videos though I haven't watched a whole bunch of them but so far I'm finding some good information. Thanks! I haven't found too many other people that get into the description of the violation of ham and Canaan with Noah's wife and possibly with Noah himself. I personally think ham castrated Noah and that's why it was end of life, and violated Noahs wife. It has to do with royal lineage..... Like Absalom & David etc where usurping HEADSHIP makes that person the ROYAL HEIR. Check out the law of the seed of nibiru.... You'll see a very similar parallel

BTW, full preterism is the only eschatologically correct "the end" view ;) The True Seed (Christ) has already ascended to the throne. Theres no other future prophecy. We are now running VERTICALLY , not on a horizontal prophetic timeline.

I do thank you for your videos. It really started sparking some more in-depth connections that I hadn't really put together fully. May God Bless your efforts.

God can fulfill things anyway He wants. I went over that in the video including using the years of Jesus' ministry to show how times can be fulfilled in ways that aren't strict to the numbers. Friday to Sunday fits and even fulfills the Jonah prophecy.

No because the image can only follow once the beast comes into existence and after the first part of the prophecy is fulfilled. The image is trump who was set up by the antichrist. You've already seen the son of satan standing next to trump. Trump was and is only a puppet. His purpose was to give power to the antichrist (in human terms) which he did. Can you guess who the son of satan is? He's already here and hiding in plain sight.

@@adhdpersons The first beast is probably the Catholic Church. Their inquisition, and oppression of the Americas. Their liturgies (in the face of God) and blasphemies of praying to saints and virgins...

Daniel 12:4 4 “But you, Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book until the time of the end; many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall increase.”

@@connectingthebible-deeperb5680 That's not talking about the entire Bible. Your lack of faith in God to protect His Word is disturbing.

@@my1vice That verse in Daniel did not say the scroll of Daniel would be revealed, but that knowledge will increase in the end. Knowledge! That's exactly what it said. How about Revelation for confirmation of this concept... Revelation 10:7 7 but in the days of the sounding of the seventh angel, when he is about to sound, the mystery of God would be finished, as He declared to His servants the prophets. The mystery of God would be finished by the second coming of Jesus Christ as God speaks through His servants. How about when the Holy Spirit spoke through Peter? Acts 2:17-18 17 ‘And it shall come to pass in the last days, says God, That I will pour out of My Spirit on all flesh; Your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, Your young men shall see visions, Your old men shall dream dreams. 18 And on My menservants and on My maidservants I will pour out My Spirit in those days; And they shall prophesy. All these things are adding up to the clear message from God, that He will let knowledge grow in the end and things that were not known will be known. So this being incorrect for 2,000 years means nothing. Wrong is wrong, no matter how long people believe in something. God reigns above all and He can reveal things anyway He wants. He even told you throughout the Bible, this knowledge will increase in the end.

​@@connectingthebible-deeperb5680 Out of Context.

The only way to verify is if the events I talk about come true. Come back to the channel if it does come true. The first event should be some kind of food shortage. If that happens then you'll know the methodology I use, comes from God. If it doesn't happen, then I'll say so myself on video.

Let me think about how to incorporate that into one of my videos. Good suggestion, thank you.

@@connectingthebible-deeperb5680 I ask about Trinity vs Oneness because both sides use biblical verses to back that particular belief and I find myself puzzled as to which side to lean towards.. I find Geno Jennings explains the best for the Oneness belief.. very convincing, indeed.